Skip to content

docs(reporting): update shared row storage migration guidance - #1879

Merged
bokelley merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
fix/1495-row-storage-drop-constraint-hint-next
Nov 8, 2026
Merged

bokelley merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
fix/1495-row-storage-drop-constraint-hint-next

Conversation

@bokelley

@bokelley bokelley commented Nov 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Carry the shared row-storage migration guidance to the SDK 10 / reporting-storage 0.2 release line. The readiness refusal already supplies an executable schema-qualified statement with the actual quoted constraint name, including embedded quotes.

Tested: 28 row-storage PostgreSQL tests and 4 cross-SDK interoperability tests.

Related: #1495, adcontextprotocol/adcp-client#3651 (JavaScript fix), #1880 (main release line).

@aao-secretariat aao-secretariat Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ladon verdict: Approve

Approve — docs-only change, no blocking findings.

This PR touches a single non-generated documentation file (docs/reporting-row-storage.md, +10/−9). It reframes the shared-row-storage FK guidance to match the SDK 10 / reporting-storage 0.2 line (no fixed Python/JS release creates the obligation_id FK; legacy DBs apply JS migration 0011 or drop the constraint) and quotes the constraint identifier in both SQL blocks to match the surrounding prose. No wire-shape, public-surface, or semver impact; coherent with untouched layout-notes text.

No gated paths (gated_paths: false), no high-risk flag, no no-auto-approve team match, no prior decision. Reviewer surfaced zero Critical/High/Medium findings. None of decision rows 1–8 fire → row 9 approve.

@bokelley
bokelley merged commit 8e67cd2 into next Nov 8, 2026
32 checks passed
@bokelley
bokelley deleted the fix/1495-row-storage-drop-constraint-hint-next branch November 8, 2026 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant